<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Year of The Geek - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-694f6e61" type="application/json"/><link>http://theyearofthegeek.disqus.com/</link><description>Geekery on Steroids</description><atom:link href="http://theyearofthegeek.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:13:54 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A Long Overdue Thunderbolt Review-type-thing</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/#comment-235559442</link><description>Thanks for a thorough review.  I'm a Verizon customer on the original Droid and due for an upgrade.  I'm not going to get a 3G phone so it's just a question of how long do I wait to upgrade.  There are only 4 4G phones, all with their own Pro's and Con's.  I'll probably upgrade in the next couple weeks here and the Thunderbolt is the one I'll get.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">SLeepdepD</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:13:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Long Overdue Thunderbolt Review-type-thing</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/#comment-233370290</link><description>Ahh, thanks for letting me know. I'll make a note.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:19:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Long Overdue Thunderbolt Review-type-thing</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/06/a-long-overdue-thunderbolt-review-type-thing/#comment-233365890</link><description>Not all HTC phones come with Sense. My G2 aka Desire Z was/is AOSP and was heavily advertised as that.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Sliwowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:11:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Getting more from my Original DROID (Part 2: Restoring and Troubleshooting)</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/04/getting-more-from-my-original-droid-part-2/#comment-203151991</link><description>Thanks for this! I'm considering CM7 for my Droid, and your write-up is really helpful!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xmichaelx</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 13:39:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Stupid TUAW post: &amp;#8220;Why I&amp;#8217;m staying with AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8221; and a moron too!</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/#comment-130727511</link><description>They build fairly solid products and people should buy them because of that...not because it looks nice in their hand or living room.  It pains me to see a person drop $2000 on a computer that they use for internet browsing and e-mail.  I also remember when it was so "corporate" to have a smart phone...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:01:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Stupid TUAW post: &amp;#8220;Why I&amp;#8217;m staying with AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8221; and a moron too!</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/#comment-130723013</link><description>The iPhone is the Ford Mustang of the cell phone world. People will buy it because they do see it as a status symbol even though, as John M. pointed out, they are everywhere and everyone and their grandmother has one. It sickens me, though, to think how many people have AT&amp;amp;T service because of the iPhone. Too many of them will stick with AT&amp;amp;T, though, out of fear or out of habit. Smart(er) people will flock to Verizon, while the smartest will stay away from a device that REQUIRES a "bumper" to function. I have my father-in-law's subscription to MacWorld as my bathroom reading and it cracks me up how many of their advertisers have to mention that their iPhone accessories are compatible with the original bumper. Holy shit! Accessories designed around accessories (which are actually not accessories since you kind of need them to make the device work). I love Mac Pro desktops, but the love ends there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ben Murphy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:51:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Stupid TUAW post: &amp;#8220;Why I&amp;#8217;m staying with AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8221; and a moron too!</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/#comment-128268115</link><description>I actually like the hardware of the iPhone more than the operating system itself, but you've seen the people who use the iPhone religiously, they have no idea what they're doing for the most part and most just get the damn thing as a status symbol, even though EVERYONE has one now.  I guess I expected too much from a technology blogger...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:09:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Another Stupid TUAW post: &amp;#8220;Why I&amp;#8217;m staying with AT&amp;#038;T&amp;#8221; and a moron too!</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2011/01/another-stupid-tuaw-post-why-im-staying-with-att/#comment-128265481</link><description>Weird how AT&amp;amp;T's bad cell phone service is largely brushed aside. Seems like most iPhone users don't care that the iPhone is a pretty shitty phone, they just want apps.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Sliwowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:02:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: T-Mobile, Big Red, Samsung, and Moto dump on the Open Handset Alliance</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/#comment-62554022</link><description>I believe this is what you're referring to: &lt;a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/16/motorola-responds-to-droid-x-bootloader-controversy-says-efuse/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.engadget.com/2010/0...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This does make it sound much better than bricking the phone.  I'm glad they actually cleared that up so quickly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:09:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: T-Mobile, Big Red, Samsung, and Moto dump on the Open Handset Alliance</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2010/07/t-mobile-big-red-samsung-and-moto-dump-on-the-open-handset-alliance/#comment-62552391</link><description>According to Motorola the eFuse won't brick your phone, just put it in recovery mode so you can flash an "approved" version of the OS. Not horrible but not as bad as bricking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm not a fan of "Junkware" but it's something that comes with carrier branding. I am sure that the OHA has some provision to allow for this just because stuff like this has been going on forever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;AFAIK the Avatar copy loaded on the Vibrant is on the microSD card so I assume it can be deleted  via terminal, file manager or ADB. Since the Vibrant is positioned as an entertainment phone, MobiTV, Slacker Radio and Sims 3 make sense that they are included. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An outdated Kindle app doesn't really bother me since apps get updates all the time and there is a delay between manufacturing/flashing the hardware and when it goes to market.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I doubt there is a dedicated button for Gogo, most likely just a link on the screen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Either way, if someone is THAT put off by it (and let's be honest, 99% of people who buy these phones aren't), removing via ADB is trivial.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Sliwowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:58:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Issues with WiFi and Vista</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/09/issues-with-wifi-and-vista/#comment-20499551</link><description>So I found some people are able to connect to the network now with Vista Home.  For some reason you have to de-select "Connect to a more preferred network" AND "Connect even when network is not broadcasting."  I don't get it, but it seems to work....</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:54:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Issues with WiFi and Vista</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/09/issues-with-wifi-and-vista/#comment-16886613</link><description>I just think that if it doesn't work in the system, they shouldn't put it in.  If it's in the system, why should it not work?  Doesn't make sense.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Issues with WiFi and Vista</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/09/issues-with-wifi-and-vista/#comment-16886371</link><description>I agree that non-business/ultimate Vista flavors should take out the choice for RADIUS WPA2 just for simplicity sake. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;That said, I don't think it's a real issue in Vista, I mean if you're a user who needs RADIUS services chances are you're in a business and using the business flavor of the OS. I bet XP Home editions don't talk to RADIUS either. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Since Apple has 1 consumer version of their OS they don't have to deal with this hassle (as obscure as it is).
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;You get paid the big bucks to figure these things out so I don't see why you're so upset.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tomsliwowski</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:08:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Computer Repair is ever complete without&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/08/computer-repair-is-never-complete-without/#comment-14733968</link><description>I just got my laptop back from Apple.  It's completely fixed...guess what they replaced?  The ribbon cable....case closed.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 14:56:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Computer Repair is ever complete without&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/08/computer-repair-is-never-complete-without/#comment-14393943</link><description>Excellent point.  What you expect and demand from a repairman of any technology is how I perform my work.  It's why I have great references from former employers for the last 15 years.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">cruzagonzalezjr</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 17:09:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 RC1 Update</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/05/windows-7-rc1-update/#comment-13993555</link><description>I was able to upgrade from beta to RC and RC to post RC by choosing the upgrade path :P</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stanislav Palatnik</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:15:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Impressions on Windows 7</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/05/my-impressions-on-windows-7/#comment-13917986</link><description>Thanks for that tip, Brad.  I suppose I'll wait for a real Windows 7 version to come out, not a big rush really.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Mahlman IV</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 10:20:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Impressions on Windows 7</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/05/my-impressions-on-windows-7/#comment-13917985</link><description>Macdrive 7.2.6 installs ok on win 7 beta build 7000.  you do have to edit the MSI file using some free tools.  google around and you'll find instructions.   Unfortunately it doesn't appear to work anymore on win 7 RC1.  The same install trick works but the driver fails to load when you reboot and if you try to repair the installer cancels.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">brad</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 01:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eMachine Computer Repair Job</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/01/emachine-computer-repair-job/#comment-13917949</link><description>So I'm not going to write a whole update on how this ended, I'll simply put a comment here:
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;He decided to stick with the 512MB stick.  I tested the RAM in another computer and it was fine, and another power supply in the computer resulted in the same red flags.  It's definitely the motherboard.  So instead of shelling out $60 more for a working motherboard he'd rather deal with 512MB of RAM.  Not necessarily terrible in Windows XP.  Now he's having some minor Java issues as well as a failed CD drive which has nothing to do with me, but now I'm his computer guy so I'm helping a bit.  No charge for emailing me;-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Mahlman IV</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 16:47:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eMachine Computer Repair Job</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/01/emachine-computer-repair-job/#comment-13917946</link><description>Thank you for this useful post. I found your blog through google.  And am glad I found your blog. And I have added your site to my bookmarks :) Computer repairing is a very important subject and people should be aware of DIY stuffs. Healthy computer is an happy computer :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Mr.Computer repair</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 18:05:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eMachine Computer Repair Job</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/01/emachine-computer-repair-job/#comment-13917944</link><description>&lt;a href="#comment-11" rel="nofollow"&gt;@Tom&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;br&gt;I forgot about that.  Much fun there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:08:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: eMachine Computer Repair Job</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2009/01/emachine-computer-repair-job/#comment-13917941</link><description>Don't forget the CPU FSB being set at 100MHz instead of 166 and the hunt for a homebrew BIOS to correct it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 16:55:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Upgrading the Hard Drive in a MacBook Pro (Late 2006 &amp;#8211; Core 2 Duo)</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2008/11/upgrading-the-hard-drive-in-a-macbook-pro-late-2006-core-2-duo/#comment-13917860</link><description>And of course, the price dropped by $10 in 3 days.  Oh well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:26:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just a little &amp;#8220;Wow&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2008/09/just-a-little-wow/#comment-13917738</link><description>The idea looks very hot. I just hope it's as awesome in practice as on the vid. Also I do wish that there would be a touchscreen input standard across all devices but I doubt it will happen as there are too many people and too many egos to appease...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 01:44:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Some [tech] Info about Me</title><link>http://yearofthegeek.net/2008/09/some-tech-info-about-me/#comment-13917718</link><description>Like I said, I do like the server, but just some things bother me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John M.</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 10:44:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
